ReviewVisceral medicine2026
Current Treatment Options in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Appendix.
Review in Visceral medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (aNETs) are rare, they are the most common type of appendiceal neoplasms, often discovered incidentally during surgeries for acute appendicitis. Appendiceal NETs are typically well-differentiated and associated with an excellent prognosis after adequate surgical therapy. Summary: Management of aNETs depends on tumor size, grade, and risk factors for lymph node and metastasis. Current guidelines from the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) recommend appendectomy only for low-risk tumors (<1 cm) and more extensive resection (right hemicolectomy [RHC]) for high-risk tumors (>2 cm or incomplete resection). However, the management of intermediate-sized tumors (1-2 cm) remains debated as RHC may not improve survival. Risk factors such as lymphovascular invasion or mesoappendiceal infiltration over 3 mm may prompt RHC consideration. However, current evidence suggests that long-term outcome is not affected by the extent of surgery in aNETs 1-2 cm in size questioning the necessity of RHC in these cases. Advanced metastatic aNETs, extremely rare in occurrence, follow treatment guidelines similar to other gastroenteropancreatic NETs and may involve multimodal therapy, including surgery, radiological interventions, and systemic treatment tailored to the patient's condition and disease burden. Key Messages: Appendectomy is adequate for most aNETs, particularly those smaller than 1 cm, G1, and without high-risk features. RHC is recommended for tumors larger than 2 cm, but for tumors 1-2 cm, evidence increasingly suggests that RHC may not confer a survival benefit. Metastatic aNETs are rare, and individualized, multidisciplinary therapy approaches are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.