ReviewFrontiers in digital health2026
Large language models for promoting physical activity: a review of experiential and behavioral outcomes, social roles, and human-likeness in persuasive LLMs.
Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly reshaping the landscape of conversational agents for health behavior change, enabling more human-like interactions than earlier rule-based systems. In the domain of physical activity promotion, however, the understanding of the outcomes of these technologies remains fragmented. This review examines the current state of LLM-based conversational agents designed to support physical activity, drawing on 13 studies. The analysis identifies three cross-cutting themes. First, it emphasizes the experiential, motivational, and behavioral outcomes of the reviewed studies, highlighting positive effects on user engagement, while stressing that evidence for a direct, sustained impact on objectively measured physical activity remains limited. Second, it shows that LLMs may assume a variety of social roles, entailing different relational dynamics. Third, it points out that people anthropomorphize LLM-based conversational agents, which can enhance emotional investment and strengthen the user-agent "relationship", but may also foster over-reliance and misplaced expectations. Building on these findings, we critically discuss ethical concerns raised by the growing persuasive capacities of LLMs in this domain, including the redistribution of agency between users, technologies, and third parties and the risks tied to users' tendency to ascribe humanness to artificial agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.