ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2026
Clinical educators' perspectives about use of digital tools and Challenges in their Use in clinical teaching and patient care: A qualitative study.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To explore how clinical educators integrate digital tools in teaching and patient care and identify challenges and strategies influencing their digital competence. Methodology: A qualitative exploratory study was conducted from October 2024 to August 2025. Using maximum variation purposive sampling, postgraduate clinical educators (≥2 years' experience) across various specialties from three tertiary care hospitals of Islamabad, Pakistan were interviewed after informed consent. Data was transcribed and thematic analysis was done. Results: Three themes emerged: (1) Impact of Digital Tools-confidence and teaching influence; (2) Barriers and Challenges-technological constraints and resistance; (3) Sustainable Practice-emotional readiness and institutional support. Conclusion: Clinical educators showed varied digital competence. While digital tools offer significant potential to enhance learning and patient care, they also introduce contextual challenges, highlighting the need for institutional support and professional development for sustainable digital integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.