ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Self-initiated feedback enhances reward positivity during motor learning in a standing weight-shifting task.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Objectives: In motor learning, post-trial feedback provides critical information for interpreting action outcomes and adjusting subsequent motor output. One factor that may influence how feedback is processed is agency. Methods: Thirty-two healthy young adults performed a standing weight-shifting task in which they reached targets without an online center of pressure (COP) display. Feedback was displayed using colors and arrows. We compared self-initiated feedback (sFB), which participants obtained by pressing a button, with externally provided feedback (eFB), which was delivered by the experimenter. Electroencephalography (EEG) data were analyzed using a counterbalanced within-subject crossover design to compare feedback-related neural responses between conditions. Because the same task was performed in both phases, motor performance was compared between groups using data from the first phase only in order to avoid carryover effects. Reward positivity (RewP) was measured as a neural indicator of reward processing. Motor performance was evaluated as the distance error between the maximal COP position and the target location. Results: RewP was significantly larger in the sFB condition than in the eFB condition, suggesting enhanced reward processing under self-initiated feedback. During the training sessions, distance error decreased in both groups, indicating a learning effect. In the post-training test sessions, a significant main effect of group was observed. Exploratory Conclusion: In a standing weight-shifting task, self-initiated feedback enhanced RewP amplitude, which reflects reward processing, and improved retention of postural control ability. These findings suggest that obtaining feedback with a sense of agency influences neural reward processing and the retention of motor learning effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.