Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42487824›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

Managing infectious mass casualty incidents in port environments strategy development and evaluation within the ARMIHN project.

Nadine Sprössel, Julian Heuser, Angelina Klein, Marcus Oldenburg, Lukas Belz, Volker Harth, Lena Ehlers, Martin Dirksen-Fischer, Boris Tolg, Axel Ekkernkamp and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Nadine SprösselDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Julian HeuserDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Angelina KleinDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Marcus OldenburgCentral Department of Occupational Medicine and Maritime Medicine, Medical University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Lukas BelzCentral Department of Occupational Medicine and Maritime Medicine, Medical University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Volker HarthCentral Department of Occupational Medicine and Maritime Medicine, Medical University Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Lena EhlersHamburg Port Health Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin Dirksen-FischerHamburg Port Health Center, Hamburg, Germany.
Boris TolgUniversity of Applied Sciences Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Axel EkkernkampDepartment of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Rehabilitative Medicine, Department of Surgery, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
M Sinan BakirMSB Medical School Berlin, University of Health and Medicine, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The ARMIHN project ("Adaptives Resilienz Management im Hafen"/"Adaptive Resilience Management in the Port") aims to develop an operational strategy for managing mass casualty incidents involving infectious diseases (MCI-ID) in port environments. The strategy considers structural, organizational, and technical measures, accounting for end-user needs and local infrastructural characteristics, with the aim of optimizing patient care and facilitating a rapid transition back to individual-level standards of care. Methods: A selective literature review identified existing national concepts, guidelines, and frameworks related to major incident management in Germany. Port infrastructural conditions were assessed through on-site inspections and stakeholder engagement. To evaluate the strategy, structured crisis management exercises were conducted, comprising three command-level tabletop exercises and one full-scale field exercise. Participant self-assessments were collected via a five-point Likert scale questionnaire before and after each exercise; pre-to-post differences were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact test where appropriate. Results: A MCI-ID operational strategy for the Port of Hamburg was developed in alignment with existing frameworks, integrating local infrastructural capacities and the expected temporal sequence of emergency resource deployment. The strategy comprises four phases: phase 1 (initial notification), Phase 2 (vessel arrival), Phase 3 (on-site rescue and medical response), and Phase 4 (transport and handover to preclinical emergency services). Exercise evaluations demonstrated statistically significant improvements across all domains, including basic MCI skills, incident management quality, confidence, and perceived team preparedness. Mean Likert scores increased from 3.33 to 4.03 in the command exercise ( Conclusion: The developed strategy addresses a structural gap in existing MCI frameworks by providing a port-and maritime-specific response concept for infectious mass casualty incidents. Grounded in disaster medicine principles and refined through stakeholder engagement and repeated exercises, the framework enhances operational preparedness among involved organizations. Its phase-based architecture offers a transferable foundation adaptable to diverse MCI scenarios and pathogen types, contributing to the long-term resilience of port-based emergency management systems.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesDisaster PlanningMass Casualty IncidentsGermanyHumansARMIHN projectdisaster medicineinfectious diseaseinfectious outbreakmaritime medicinemass casualty incidentoperational strategyport

Identifiers

PMID42487824
PMCPMC13388810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.