ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Toward a human-centered digital ecosystem: bridging the "AI Chasm" in intelligent nosocomial infection monitoring.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) pose a persistent global threat to patient safety, rendering traditional, resource-intensive manual surveillance increasingly unsustainable. While intelligent nosocomial infection monitoring systems (INIMS) offer a transformative digital solution, their clinical integration is frequently derailed by the "AI Chasm"-a critical misalignment between algorithmic design and clinical ergonomics. This Perspective transcends theoretical performance metrics to dissect real-world socio-technical barriers, including alert fatigue, dataset shift, and medico-legal liability. Unlike traditional socio-technical models (such as the SEIPS or NASSS frameworks) that primarily focus on the retrospective evaluation of health IT usability, our framework provides a proactive, pre-deployment governance strategy. To bridge this implementation gap, we propose a human-centered governance ecosystem anchored in two practical frameworks: "silent-mode validation" for safe, prospective clinical debugging, and "data solidarity" to ensure equitable resource allocation, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Ultimately, this framework outlines an actionable pathway to translate isolated technological innovations into sustainable, clinically integrated public health tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.