ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Exploring attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccinations amongst healthcare workers at a national infectious disease center in Singapore-a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Vaccine hesitancy among healthcare workers (HCWs) affects pandemic preparedness and public trust. This study used the theoretical domains framework to examine COVID-19 vaccination uptake, attitudes, and information sources among staff at Singapore's National Center for Infectious Diseases (NCID). Methods: A cross-sectional anonymous electronic survey was distributed to all 695 NCID employees between July and October 2022. Participation was voluntary, and 207 staff who agreed to participate completed and submitted the survey. The questionnaire captured demographics, vaccination history and timing, intentions for future boosters, information sources, and determinants mapped to domains such as knowledge, beliefs about consequences, social role, intentions, social influences, and sentiments. Results: Of 695 staff, 207 responded (29.8%); 99.5% of the respondents had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose and 84.5% reported yearly influenza vaccination. Government or official sources, local news, hospital teaching, and scientific journals were key information sources. Overall, 22.7% reported reservations about COVID-19 vaccines, mainly concerning short- and long-term side effects, perceived low efficacy, and underlying medical conditions. Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine uptake among responding HCWs was high, but nearly one-quarter still reported reservations, mainly related to side effects, perceived efficacy, and pre-existing medical conditions. Trusted institutional and official information sources, together with workplace education, appear to support vaccine confidence. These findings suggest that future vaccination strategies for HCWs should prioritize clear risk communication, trusted education channels, and approaches that support sustained voluntary booster acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.