ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Environmental sanitation satisfaction and associated factors among residents from National Sanitary Cities.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Residents are not only beneficiaries of National Sanitary City development but also participants who judge whether sanitation improvements translate into tangible daily benefits. This study assessed residents' subjective satisfaction with urban environmental sanitation and its associated factors to identify weaknesses relevant to people-centered sanitation governance. Methods: Between November 2021 and April 2022, a multistage sampling method was employed to evaluate the environmental sanitation satisfaction of 17,865 residents in National Sanitary Cities and non-National Sanitary Cities within four provincial-level administrative regions using a standardized structured questionnaire. Results: To meet the evaluation requirements, we selected 80 and 90% of the total scores as the criteria for judging satisfaction. At the 80% satisfaction cut-off point, 22.038% of residents expressed satisfaction with environmental sanitation, with residents in National Sanitary Cities showing a higher level of satisfaction (23.375%). Environmental sanitation satisfaction was associated with gender, educational level, age, occupation, living area, residence duration, and health literacy ( Conclusion: The findings suggest that National Sanitary City status was more clearly related to high-level environmental sanitation satisfaction. Overall satisfaction remained low, and residents' perceptions were also shaped by demographic, socioeconomic, living-area, and regional contextual factors. Routine attention to residents' subjective perceptions can complement objective sanitation indicators and help refine people-centered policy actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.