SynthesisFrontiers in public health2026
Fall prevention education among older hospital inpatients: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From information to action- a phase-based analysis of patient engagement in inpatient fall prevention: A scoping review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hospitalized older adults are at high risk of falls. Although fall prevention education is recommended in hospital settings, the efficacy of different education programs remains inconsistent. This study aimed to systematically review the effectiveness of fall prevention education interventions among older inpatients. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized or trial-linked evaluations of fall prevention education programs for inpatients aged ≥60 years. A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to January 7, 2026. Risk of bias was assessed for all included evaluations. Intervention characteristics, including format, content, duration, providers, and theoretical frameworks, were extracted and analyzed. Results: Twelve reports describing 11 trial-based evaluations were included, with risk of bias ranging from low to high. Most reports described session-level or initial education contact of ≤1 h, whereas six reports incorporated protocol-specified repeated education, reinforcement, or post-education contact. Interventions varied considerably in format, content, duration, and providers, including physiotherapists, an occupational therapist, nurses or nurse investigators, a trained MSc sport science student, allied health assistants, and investigators with unspecified professional background. Five evaluations reported reductions in at least one fall-related measure, and one evaluation reported benefit only among cognitively intact patients. Six evaluations reported favorable education-related outcomes where measured. Behavior-related outcomes were mixed: three reports showed improvements in selected risk-reducing behaviors, whereas two reports found no significant behavior-related between-group differences. The 11 assessed programs used several theoretical or design approaches and demonstrated high educational-design quality, with scores ranging from 15 to 17 on a 17-point scale. Conclusion: Fall prevention education may help reduce falls and improve related outcomes among older inpatients; however, substantial heterogeneity in study design, intervention characteristics, and outcome measures limits generalizability. The use of explicit theoretical or design approaches may support more structured educational intervention design, but further comparative evaluation is needed to determine which delivery models and components are most effective. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251238711.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.