ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
How reading behavior shapes physical and mental health: evidence from China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Against the backdrop of the deepening development of nationwide reading and the continuous advancement of the Healthy China strategy, reading is not only an important direction for expanding public cultural services but also a crucial support for building a Healthy China. This paper utilizes data from the Chinese General Social Survey and employs ordered Probit regression models to systematically examine the effects and underlying mechanisms of reading behavior regarding residents' physical and mental health. Findings indicate that reading behavior is significantly positively correlated with residents' physical and mental health, with heterogeneity observed across urban-rural, regional, and age dimensions. Specifically, the health benefits are significantly greater for rural residents and those in central and western regions compared to urban residents and those in eastern regions. Furthermore, reading exerts a significant positive effect on the health of middle-aged and older adults, while exhibiting a suppressive effect among the young population. Further mechanism analysis reveals that reading improves residents' physical and mental health through three pathways: enhancing self-cognition, improving subjective social status, and reducing health risk perception bias. Therefore, governments should continuously optimize public cultural services and implement differentiated reading promotion strategies targeting different regions and age groups, so as to maximize the health benefits of reading and provide strong support for improving residents' health and advancing the Healthy China strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.