ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
The experiences of three women who underwent termination of pregnancy for medical reasons: a comparative methodological study using grounded theory analysis and interpretative phenomenological analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Termination of pregnancy [ToP] for medical reasons, especially for a wanted pregnancy, is an underexplored area in public health. Women face significant emotional, psychological, and social challenges, often compounded by inconsistent policies, healthcare inequities, and societal stigma. Additionally, the decision-making process can be influenced by financial and systemic factors, with women reporting long-lasting emotional impacts and inadequate mental health support following a ToP. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with three women who underwent ToP for medical reasons, for an otherwise wanted pregnancy. Data were analysed using Grounded Theory Analysis [GTA] and Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis [IPA] to explore the personal experiences of women who underwent ToP, focusing on their grief, decision-making, and interactions with healthcare professionals. Results: Three key themes emerged from the GTA: (1) terminating a wanted pregnancy; (2) compassionate terminology; and (3) lasting impact. Together these led to the emergent theory of 'A Shadow Not Shaken'. The IPA also rendered three key themes: (1) holding onto anger; (2) terminology undermines pain; and (3) advocating for self. The GTA focused mostly on the psycho-social experiences of their interactions with healthcare professionals and how this shaped their perception of their ToP, whilst the IPA provided an understanding of how these interactions were experienced. Discussion: This study highlights the emotional impact and lasting effects of ToP for medical reasons. It emphasises the need for compassionate, empathetic care from healthcare professionals to reduce stigma and psychological distress. Healthcare providers should prioritise emotional support and clear communication. Future research should explore how these results apply to diverse contexts, aiming to improve care and reduce stigma for women undergoing ToP. Clinical practice should reflect how the relationship between women and healthcare professionals is crucial, and account for the current lack of empathetic care, adequate emotional support, and ongoing stigma relating to ToP. The study also provides further evidence for the value of using dual-methodology qualitative approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.