Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42487762›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Machine learning-based prediction of suicide attempts among adolescents: a national study using explainable artificial intelligence.

Eun Sun So, Ji-Young Yeo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eun Sun SoCollege of Nursing, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Young YeoAI Institute, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and evaluate machine learning models for predicting adolescent suicide attempts and to examine predictor contributions using explainable artificial intelligence. Methods: A repeated cross-sectional study used pooled data from the 2017-2024 Korea Youth Risk Behavior Web-Based Survey (n=448, 798). Models including logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost were developed to classify suicide attempts. Performance was evaluated using AUC, F1 score, and sensitivity-oriented screening thresholds to reflect population-level screening purposes. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) quantified predictor contributions. Results: The models showed moderate predictive performance, with XGBoost achieving the highest F1 score and random forest showing the highest sensitivity under the screening condition. SHAP analysis indicated that hopelessness contributed most strongly to prediction, followed by school violence and perceived stress. Additional contributors included self-rated health, household economic status, sleep satisfaction, and behavioral indicators. Under the screening condition, sensitivity improved, although positive predictive values remained low. Conclusion: Machine learning models demonstrated moderate performance in predicting adolescent suicide attempts. Psychological and social variables contributed most strongly to prediction, and SHAP improved the interpretability of model outputs, supporting their potential utility for population-level screening support.

Indexed as

adolescentmachine learningprediction modelSHAPsuicide attempts

Identifiers

PMID42487762
PMCPMC13390233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.