Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42487761›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Toward a hybrid assessment framework for adolescent borderline personality disorder: a mini review of personality functioning, digital biomarkers, and AI-supported assessment.

Sara Močnik, Hojka Gregorič Kumperščak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sara MočnikUnit for Paediatric and Adolescent Psychiatry, Division of Paediatrics, University Medical Centre, Maribor, Slovenia.
Hojka Gregorič KumperščakUnit for Paediatric and Adolescent Psychiatry, Division of Paediatrics, University Medical Centre, Maribor, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) in adolescence is increasingly recognized as a valid and clinically meaningful diagnosis, yet it remains frequently underdetected and undertreated. Diagnostic uncertainty often arises from overlap between typical developmental features, such as emotional reactivity, identity exploration, and fluctuating peer relationships, and the pathological instability characteristic of BPD. Stigma and clinician hesitancy to diagnose before age 18 further delay intervention, despite evidence that early identification improves outcomes. Dimensional diagnostic frameworks, including the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders and ICD-11, define personality pathology through impairments in levels of personality functioning (LPF) across self and interpersonal domains. Validated adolescent instruments such as the LoPF-Q 12-18 and AIDA operationalize these constructs, but rely on static and retrospective self-report, limiting their ability to capture rapid, context-dependent shifts in adolescent BPD. This mini review synthesizes diagnostic challenges, evaluates LPF-based assessment tools, and highlights the need for approaches that better capture dynamic variability. Digital phenotyping and artificial intelligence (AI) offers promising adjuncts to traditional assessments. Candidate digital biomarkers from smartphones and wearables, including speech patterns, activity data, and physiological signals, may provide continuous and ecologically valid indicators relevant to personality functioning. Rather than presenting a validated diagnostic framework, this mini review proposes a conceptual direction for future hybrid assessment integrating LPF-based tools, structured clinical interviews, ecological momentary assessment, and candidate digital biomarkers.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceborderline personality disorderdigital biomarkershybrid assessmentpersonality functioning

Identifiers

PMID42487761
PMCPMC13389489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.