ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
A novel interpretable machine learning framework for predicting postpartum depression: a SHAP-based analysis of maternal and infant health indicators.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Postpartum depression (PPD) affects nearly 20% of women globally. Conventional regression models often have limited predictive accuracy. Objective: This study aimed to create and test a machine learning model for predicting PPD using comprehensive infant and maternal health indicators. Methods: In this prospective study, 273 postpartum women were enrolled, and data on 44 demographic, obstetric, and clinical variables were collected. After 1:2 propensity-score matching, participants were divided (7:3) into training and validation sets. Feature selection was executed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Nine machine learning algorithms were compared, including random forest, gradient boosting, support vector machines, and logistic regression. The Area Under Curve (AUC), calibration, and decision-curve analyses were employed to determine the performance of the model. The Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was utilized to explore model interpretability. Results: LASSO regression identified four key predictors of PPD: unplanned mode of delivery, premature rupture of membranes, NRS pain score at 10 cm cervical dilation, and socioeconomic subclass. Among the nine models tested, the random forest model exhibited superior overall performance, achieving an AUC of 0.952 in the training set and 0.745 in the hold-out validation set. SHAP analysis revealed that unplanned delivery and high intrapartum pain were the strongest positive contributors to PPD risk, while higher socioeconomic status served as a protective factor. Conclusion: The interpretable random-forest model, which integrates explainable artificial intelligence with obstetric data, accurately predicted PPD six weeks postpartum. It provides a practical tool for individualized screening and early intervention. Future multicenter studies that incorporate biological and psychosocial markers are needed to improve generalizability and applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.