ArticleNursing research and practice2026
Assessing Genomic Competencies: Insights From the Genetics and Genomics Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS).
Article in Nursing research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing Genomic Competencies: Insights From the Genetics and Genomics Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS).Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In ICU settings, genomic information can contribute to diagnostic clarification, individualized treatment planning, medication optimization, and appropriate referral to specialized genetic services. Critically ill patients frequently present with complex multisystem conditions, inherited disorders, or unexplained clinical manifestations that may have underlying genetic components. Consequently, genomic literacy among ICU nurses is particularly important to support family history assessment, recognition of genetic risk factors, patient education, and genomics-informed clinical decision-making. However, translating genomic knowledge into effective nursing practice requires not only foundational genomic knowledge but also positive attitudes, adequate confidence, and strong clinical decision-making skills among nurses. Purpose: This study evaluates the knowledge, attitudes, receptivity, confidence, and practices related to genetics and genomics among registered nurses working in ICUs in Amman, Jordan. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted with 229 ICU nurses recruited conveniently from three hospitals in Amman. Participants completed the Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS). Results: The Jordanian nurses demonstrated adequate knowledge/competencies of genetics and genomics concepts, with an average score of 66.9% on the competency subscale. They had a positive attitude toward integrating genetics into their practice and exhibited high confidence in accessing and sharing genetic information. Clinical application remained limited, with 82.1% of providers rarely or never collecting a comprehensive family history. Adoption of genetics and genomics in practice was influenced by providers' intent to expand their knowledge and their perceptions of the value and relevance of family history in patient care. Most nurses expressed a desire to learn more about genetics, especially if supported by senior nurses. A significant positive correlation was found between knowledge and confidence scores ( Conclusion: While nurses possessed adequate knowledge and positive attitudes, their practical application of genetic information, particularly in family history assessment, was limited. A strong desire for further, peer-supported education was observed. These findings emphasize the need for targeted training programs to bridge the gap between knowledge and practice, ultimately enhancing the quality of genetic-informed nursing care in the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.