Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42487731›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin open2026

Mapping Schizotypy and Subthreshold Psychotic Experiences in a Resilience-Risk Network: Insights from a Population-Based Study.

Phuong Do Lan, Matthias Schärer, Birgit Kleim, Adela Maria Isvoranu, Mario Müller, Wulf Rössler, Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross, Anastasia Theodoridou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Phuong Do LanDepartment of Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, University of Zurich, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1184-177X
Matthias SchärerDepartment of Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, University of Zurich, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.
Birgit KleimDepartment of Experimental Psychopathology and Psychotherapy, University of Zurich, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland.
Adela Maria IsvoranuDepartment of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117570, Singapore.
Mario MüllerDepartment of Adult Psychiatry and Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
Wulf RösslerThe Zurich Program for Sustainable Development of Mental Health Services (ZInEP), University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
Vladeta Ajdacic-GrossDepartment of Adult Psychiatry and Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.
Anastasia TheodoridouDepartment of Adult Psychiatry and Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Hypothesis: Under stress exposure, individuals in the general population may already experience subtle psychotic symptoms. Given that psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) and schizotypal traits reflect a liability to developing manifest psychosis, understanding variability in psychological responses to adversity has become important. A resilience-focused framework is therefore crucial for advancing the understanding of the mechanisms underlying these symptom patterns. Here, we examined the mutual impact of resilience and risk factors on schizotypal traits and subthreshold psychotic symptoms. Study Design: This study is based on epidemiological data from the Zurich Early Recognition Program (ZInEP), a population sample ( Study Results: Chronic stress and perceived stress showed more associations with PLEs and schizotypal traits than all resilience factors. Optimism showed more associations with psychopathology than other resilience factors. Chronic stress has the highest values across all centrality indices. Perceived stress and optimism showed high values in node and bridge strength but were in a lower range for expected influence, whereas self-efficacy and adaptive coping exhibited higher values. Conclusion: Chronic stress emerged as the most prominent risk node, suggesting that its reduction through early prevention may have cascading effects across the symptom network. Optimism, adaptive coping, and self-efficacy may jointly contribute to stress regulation. These findings indicate that targeting a single factor is unlikely to influence overall symptom patterns.

Indexed as

network analysispsychotic-like experiencesresiliencerisk factorsschizotypy

Identifiers

PMID42487731
PMCPMC13390575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.