ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin open2026
The Relationship between Social Media and Schizophrenia and Other Psychotic Disorders: A Systematic Review.
Article in Schizophrenia bulletin open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Hypothesis: The impact of social media on individuals with schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders is poorly understood. We conducted a systematic review to summarize the existing literature on the association between social media use and symptoms in this population. Study Design: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Medline, from January 2010 to May 2025. We included studies which reported an association between social media use and symptoms of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders, except for reviews. Search results were screened using Rayyan, and data was extracted according to predefined categories. Study Results: The included studies were largely cross-sectional (64%), and had moderate-high risk of bias. However, some key findings emerged. Firstly, social media was linked with fewer negative symptoms and better functioning. Secondly, there was no association between increase in positive symptoms and social media use. Thirdly, the impact of social media on broad psychological distress and symptoms was dependent on engagement type. Finally, qualitative insights confirmed that this population are aware of the risks surrounding social media use; however, they also acknowledged many benefits from its use, including social connection. Conclusions: This review has clinical and public health implications, such as the need for digital literacy interventions promoting healthy social media use. However, implications are limited by the high risk of bias in findings. Future research should investigate this relationship further through randomized trials and use digital phenotyping to understand social media use patterns and their consequences based on type of engagement and platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.