ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Low cost of shifting flight altitude in migrating great snipes.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Many birds make migratory flights lasting several days. Migrants do not only repeatedly make small-scale shifts in altitude; some of them also climb and sink several thousand metres in a diel cycle. This is a seemingly energetically costly behaviour, adding to an already high energetic cost of flight. Here, we describe the climbing and sinking behaviour of migratory great snipes, Gallinago media, and discuss whether their diel altitude cycle could represent an additional energy cost to their migration. Making use of tracking data from multisensor data loggers, we quantified altitude variation and compared climb and sink rates from non-stop migratory flights lasting up to 4 days (84 h). In general, great snipes climb and sink at comparatively slow rates, averaging 0.21 m s-1 and -0.22 m s-1, respectively, almost invariably within ±0.7 m s-1, and hardly ever close to a theoretical maximum climb rate of 1.8 m s-1. Great snipes do not climb faster at night than in the day and climb and sink rates are similarly low for all long non-stop flights. The additional cost of shifting flight altitude for great snipes is apparently negligible compared with the cost of forward flight (<1%). This is largely explained by the birds flapping during a slow descent, thereby turning most of the potential energy built up during previous climbs into aerodynamic work. We conclude that the overall cost of shifting flight is probably low for most migratory birds, given that climb and sink rates are low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.