ArticleAnnals of occupational and environmental medicine2026
Construction of a musculoskeletal job-exposure matrix in Korea.
Article in Annals of occupational and environmental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMusculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are a major occupational health issue in Korea; however, a standardized job-exposure matrix (JEM) has not been established. This study aimed to develop an MSD-specific JEM using data from the Korean Working Conditions Survey (KWCS) to evaluate the exposure time proportion by job category and body segment.
methodsData from the 2nd to 6th KWCS (2006-2020), covering 210,500 workers, were analyzed. The jobs of the subjects were reclassified based on the unit groups of the 7th Korean Standard Classification of Occupations. Exposure time proportion for key MSD risk factors-repetitive movements, awkward postures, heavy lifting, and prolonged standing-was categorized as high, moderate, or low based on self-reported responses. Validity was assessed through expert review and statistical analysis, including Cohen's kappa coefficients and logistic regression.
resultsDuration-based exposure to musculoskeletal (MS) risk factors was estimated for each occupation. The JEM classified exposure time proportion for three body regions: upper extremity and neck, lower back, and lower extremity. Expert review showed high agreement for the upper extremity and neck and for the lower back (kappa > 0.8), whereas agreement was lower for the lower extremity. Logistic regression analysis indicated an exposure-response relationship between JEM-derived exposure time proportion and MS symptoms for the upper extremity and neck and the lower back.
conclusionsThis study developed Korea's first MS-specific JEM, providing a standardized framework for occupational MSD risk assessment. The JEM demonstrated strong validity for most body regions and can be a valuable tool for research, workplace risk evaluation, and policy development. Further refinements incorporating detailed job classifications and ergonomic factors are recommended to enhance its applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.