Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42487369›Full record

ReviewAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2026

Autologous peritoneal patch for venous reconstruction: A systematic review of clinical outcomes.

Abdallah Al Farai, Gabriela Del Angel-Millán, Shady Salama, ZakaUllah Jan, Mariantonietta Alagia, Mohammed Al Hosni, Fatma Al Zadjali, Gianluca Cassese, Fabrizio Panaro

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abdallah Al FaraiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, GI Program, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care & Research Center, University Medical City, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8330-2968
Gabriela Del Angel-MillánDivision of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary, Department of Oncologic and Robotic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6319-9086
Shady SalamaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, GI Program, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care & Research Center, University Medical City, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2063-589X
ZakaUllah JanDepartment of Surgical Oncology, GI Program, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care & Research Center, University Medical City, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1441-6299
Mariantonietta AlagiaDivision of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary, Department of Oncologic and Robotic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5839-2495
Mohammed Al HosniDepartment of Surgical Oncology, GI Program, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care & Research Center, University Medical City, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2102-3642
Fatma Al ZadjaliDepartment of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos Comprehensive Cancer Care & Research Center, University Medical City, Muscat, Sultanate of Oman.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3778-1269
Gianluca CasseseDivision of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary, Department of Oncologic and Robotic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9185-2054
Fabrizio PanaroDivision of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary, Department of Oncologic and Robotic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7555-0060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venous reconstruction is increasingly required during complex abdominal and oncologic surgery. Autologous parietal peritoneum (PP) has emerged as a potential graft material due to its availability, biocompatibility, and low thrombogenic profile. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of venous reconstruction using PP. A systematic search of MEDLINE (PubMed), ScienceDirect, Web of Science, and Embase was conducted from database inception to December 2025, in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Studies reporting outcomes of venous reconstruction using PP were included. Data were extracted on patient characteristics, reconstruction site, technique, anticoagulation, imaging follow-up, and outcomes. The primary outcome was vascular complications (thrombosis and stenosis). Secondary outcomes included reintervention and 30-day mortality. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute tools. A narrative synthesis with pooled proportions was performed due to heterogeneity. Twenty studies, including 277 patients, were analyzed. The most common reconstruction sites were the inferior vena cava (45%), mesenterico-portal system (36%), and hepatic veins (19%). Patch repair was performed in 77% of cases. The pooled vascular complication rate was 15.1%, including thrombosis in 5.4% and stenosis in 8.3%. The pooled 30-day mortality rate was 1.4%. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 18 months, with variable anticoagulation and imaging protocols. Autologous PP is a feasible option for venous reconstruction with acceptable short-term outcomes. However, evidence is limited by heterogeneity and a lack of long-term data, warranting further prospective studies.

Indexed as

General surgeryPeritoneumVeins

Identifiers

PMID42487369
PMCPMC13490742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.