Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42487339›Full record

ArticleAutism : the international journal of research and practice2026

Examining the Roles of Retrieval Practice and Post-Retrieval Feedback in Learning Among Autistic Adults.

Brianna E Cairney, Eileen Haebig, Heather D Lucas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Autism : the international journal of research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brianna E CairneyLouisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7831-251X
Eileen HaebigLouisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8216-7063
Heather D LucasLouisiana State University, Baton Rouge, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3427-8206

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrieval practice enhances learning and is most effective when feedback is provided. Despite robust evidence that retrieval practice and post-retrieval feedback benefit numerous clinical populations, these techniques have not been studied in autism. In two experiments, we measured retrieval practice and post-retrieval feedback effects on associative memory in autistic and non-autistic adults residing in the United States. Participants attempted to memorize semantically unrelated word pairs, which were then reviewed during a practice phase consisting of retrieval practice with and without feedback. In Experiment 1, word pairs were presented to participants (40 autistic; 40 non-autistic) auditorily. In Experiment 2, stimuli were presented visually and restudy trials were added to the practice phase. Additionally, feedback for retrieval practice trials was manipulated between-subjects (80 participants per group) and a four-alternative recognition test was used in the practice phase. In both experiments, the testing phase consisted of cued recall. Both experiments yielded benefits of feedback following initial retrieval practice across groups. In addition, Experiment 2 demonstrated that both groups benefited from retrieval practice compared to restudy, even without feedback. Our results suggest that the well-documented effects of retrieval practice, particularly in concert with post-retrieval feedback, extend to support learning among autistic as well as non-autistic individuals.Lay AbstractEvery autistic person has their own unique sensory, perceptual, and social experiences that impact learning in different ways. Although many autistic learners have average or above-average IQ, individuals with a diagnosis of autism have an increased likelihood of co-occurring learning disabilities and episodic memory difficulties. These memory-related challenges make it especially important to identify strategies that can support learning in autistic populations. Retrieval practice may be one such strategy, which involves testing oneself on previously learned information. Notably, retrieval practice supports learning among many clinical populations who experience memory and learning difficulties, yet it has not been investigated among autistic learners. This study measured the effects of retrieval practice and post-retrieval feedback among autistic and non-autistic adults (40 per group in Experiment 1; 80 per group in Experiment 2) residing in the United States. The task was divided into three sections. First, participants completed a "learning" block where they attempted to memorize unrelated word pairings (e.g.,

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderFeedback, PsychologicalLearningMental RecallPractice, PsychologicalAdolescentAdultCase-Control StudiesCuesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultassociative memoryautismautistic adultsfeedbacklearningretrieval practicetesting effect

Identifiers

PMID42487339
PMCPMC13494112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.