Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42487336›Full record

ArticleNursing open2026

The Barriers and Enablers to the Use of Alternative Approaches to Restrictive Practices: A Scoping Review and Causal Loop Diagram.

Stephanie L Bennetts, Genevieve Pepin, James J Lucas

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephanie L BennettsSchool of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5766-2388
Genevieve PepinSchool of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8382-160X
James J LucasSchool of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6238-0403

Funding

Deakin University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe use of restrictive practices in acute mental health services has long been a contentious issue globally, with well-documented harms for both service users and the practitioners required to implement them. Existing research examining what influences the uptake of alternative approaches could benefit from synthesis through a qualitative systems thinking lens, enabling deeper insights into key leverage points and the development of dynamic hypotheses. This study aimed to review the literature and develop a Causal Loop Diagram (CLD) to visualise how interconnected pathways within the literature describe the potential elimination of restrictive practices in adult acute mental healthcare services.

designA scoping review informed by Arksey and O'Malley's framework was undertaken, combined with a qualitative systems thinking approach to synthesise findings into a CLD.

methodsA systematic search and inclusion strategy identified 20 relevant articles exploring barriers and enablers to alternative approaches to restrictive practices. Key findings were extracted and synthesised, then mapped into a CLD comprising four domains: (1) peer support, relationships and communication; (2) staff capacity and the clinical environment; (3) practitioner decision-making processes; and (4) transforming practice away from the status quo.

resultsThe CLD illustrates how multiple, interdependent factors interact to influence the use of restrictive practices. It highlights the dynamic relationships between relational practices, workforce capacity, environmental conditions and clinical decision-making. The model provides a systems-level representation of the 'topography' of the literature and identifies potential feedback loops and leverage points for change, supporting the development of hypotheses for reducing restrictive practices. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patients or members of the public were involved in the design, conduct, or reporting of this research.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesHumansQualitative Researcheliminatingmental health care servicesqualitativequantitativereducingrestrictive practicesreview

Identifiers

PMID42487336
PMCPMC13392418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.