ArticleJournal of medical radiation sciences2026
An Exploration of Australian Radiographers' Perceptions of and Experiences With Imaging Autistic People.
Article in Journal of medical radiation sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAutistic individuals referred for medical imaging examinations may face barriers without appropriate adjustments. Strengthening the relationship between patients and the healthcare system is crucial, as positive patient experiences can improve adherence and future engagement with healthcare services. This study explored Australian radiographers' experiences and perceptions of imaging autistic patients. Terminology preferences among autistic individuals vary across countries, communities and individuals. This paper adopts identity-first language, 'autistic person' or 'autistic patient', aligned with recommendations from Australian organisations and medical imaging researchers.
methodsSemi-structured online interviews were conducted via Zoom with 10 diagnostic radiographers. Anonymised transcripts were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to identify patterns of meaning across participants' experiences.
resultsAll radiographers (n = 10) reported experience performing medical imaging procedures for autistic patients. Four themes were identified: (1) Educational resources and recommendations, (2) Organisational factors affecting radiographic practice, (3) Patient and carer factors affecting radiographic practice, and (4) Key strategies that facilitate positive patient care.
conclusionAlthough radiographers lacked formal training specific to caring for autistic individuals, they attributed positive patient experiences to their patient-centred approach, existing knowledge, communication skills, teamwork, and personal attitudes. Radiographers expressed interest in targeted training and remain committed to high-quality patient care. Improving the accessibility of radiology departments through collaboration with autism organisations and the broader community is essential to support better imaging experiences for all patients. Future research should prioritise the perspectives of autistic individuals and their families to comprehensively understand their medical imaging experiences and identify the range of meaningful, patient-defined indicators of quality care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.