Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42487246›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026

Advancing the Volumetric Analysis of Ultra-Low-Field Brain MRI Using Image-to-Image Translation.

Peter Hsu, Elisa Marchetto, Patricia M Johnson, Jelle Veraart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter HsuBernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9971-7710
Elisa MarchettoBernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7904-8434
Patricia M JohnsonBernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1547-9969
Jelle VeraartBernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

Funding

TR&D 4: Revealing Microstructure: Biophysical modeling and validation for discovery and clinical careP41EB017183 · NIBIB · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Hersh Chandarana · 2014 to 2026
$19.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB017183NIH HHS P41 EB017183NYU-KAIST Global Innovation and Research Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUltra-low-field (ULF) MRI offers a promising path to accessible neuroimaging, with potential to address global healthcare disparities and advance population-level brain health research. However, the inherently low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), reduced spatial resolution, and altered tissue contrasts relative to conventional high-field (HF) scans are significant barriers to ULF analysis and interpretation. While deep learning (DL) approaches have been proposed to enhance ULF image quality, many rely on synthetic training data due to the lack of available subject-matched ULF and HF scans, introducing potential "domain shift" errors when applied to real acquisitions. Here, we present a DL framework trained on real ULF and HF-MRIs to address these limitations and improve ULF-derived brain volume analysis.

methodsA CycleGAN framework was developed for image-to-image translation across field strengths, while mitigating the need for large subject-matched ULF- and HF-MRIs. This approach enabled pretraining on large open-access MRI datasets followed by fine-tuning on real ULF scans. Model performance was evaluated through downstream brain volumetric analysis, assessing volumetric agreement with HF-derived measurements and test-retest reproducibility. We additionally explored a framework to reduce input acquisition requirements, improving scan protocol efficiency while preserving enhanced performance.

resultsThe proposed methods significantly improved hippocampal volumetric agreement and brain segmentation accuracy between ULF- and HF-MRI compared with existing strategies. Test-retest reproducibility for DL-enhanced images was superior to that of direct segmentation on ULF scans.

conclusionThe proposed framework substantially improved the accuracy and reliability of ULF-derived brain volume measurements, particularly for subcortical structures such as the hippocampus.

Indexed as

BrainImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingAlgorithmsDeep LearningGenerative Adversarial NetworksHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsSignal-To-Noise Ratioaccessible neuroimagingbrain segmentationbrain volume analysisdeep learningimage‐to‐image translationultra‐low‐field MRI

Identifiers

PMID42487246
PMCPMC13527236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.