ArticleReproductive health2026
Understanding contraceptive choice after discontinuing the contraceptive pill in Germany - a qualitative inquiry.
Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContraception decision-making is a vital aspect of sexual and reproductive health, with individuals weighing various factors when choosing their current contraceptive methods. Method discontinuation is common and should not be viewed as an endpoint but rather as a starting point for selecting the next contraceptive option. However, there is a limited understanding of what former contraceptive pill users seek after discontinuation.
methodsThis study examined the decision-making process and experiences of former oral contraceptive users (N = 19) who transitioned to alternative methods in Germany. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsWe generated five key themes shaping post-pill contraceptive decisions: (1) prioritization of efficacy and pregnancy prevention, with permanent methods offering psychological relief; (2) reliance on familiarity, particularly with condoms, as a default choice; (3) strong preference for hormone-free options due to concerns over side effects and bodily autonomy; (4) embodied aversion to invasive procedures, such as IUD insertion or complex surgeries; and (5) a growing emphasis on shared responsibility and gender equality in contraception, with calls for greater male involvement and accessible non-hormonal alternatives. These findings underscore the importance of individual experiences, bodily autonomy, and equitable contraceptive access in post-pill decision making.
conclusionsThis study offers valuable insights into the complex nature of contraceptive decision-making, addressing considerations such as long-term health effects, bodily autonomy, and the need for improved contraceptive options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.