Trial reportBMC psychiatry2026
Exploring brain-gut interaction mechanisms in Transcutaneous auricular Vagus Nerve stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder.
Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe gut microbiota is intricately implicated in the pathogenesis of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), with the vagus nerve serving as a key regulatory bridge. Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) has emerged as a promising non-invasive therapeutic strategy for MDD by modulating the gut-brain axis, yet the precise brain-gut interaction mechanisms underlying its antidepressant effects remain poorly characterized. This study is a registered clinical trial (ChiCTR2200059591; Registered 4 May 2022; https://www.chictr.org.cn ). OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: This study aimed to verify the clinical efficacy of taVNS for MDD and elucidate the underlying brain-gut crosstalk mechanisms, by integrating comprehensive clinical assessments, resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) neuroimaging data and gut metagenomic profiling.
methodsNinety-five patients diagnosed with MDD were randomly allocated at a 1:1 ratio to either the active taVNS group (auricular concha stimulation) or the sham taVNS group (superior concha of mid-helix stimulation). Eighty patients (40 per group) completed the entire intervention course and were included in the final statistical analysis. All participants underwent 30-minute stimulation twice daily (4/20 Hz, 3-8 mA) for 8 consecutive weeks (5 days per week). Standardized clinical assessments were administered at baseline and post-intervention, including the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA-14), and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). Rs-fMRI was performed to quantify core neural activity metrics, including amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF), fractional ALFF (fALFF), regional homogeneity (ReHo), and degree centrality (DC); fecal samples were collected for high-throughput metagenomic analysis. Spearman correlation analysis and mediation analysis were further conducted to dissect the interactive relationships between brain neural activity and gut microbiota.
resultsThe active taVNS group achieved significantly superior clinical efficacy relative to the sham group, with a HAMD-17 response rate of 62.50% and remission rate of 35.00%, versus 30.00% and 2.50% in the sham group (all P < 0.05). Rs-fMRI analyses revealed significant group×time interaction effects on neural activity: decreased ALFF in the right calcarine sulcus; altered fALFF in the right inferior temporal gyrus, left cuneus, right superior frontal gyrus (SFG) and right angular gyrus; reduced ReHo in the right calcarine sulcus and bilateral insula; and increased DC in the right caudate nucleus and left anterior cingulate gyrus. Gut microbiota profiling identified anaerobic butyrate-producing bacteria and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii as potential biomarkers linked to taVNS therapeutic effects. HAMD-17 scores were negatively correlated with Faecalibacterium prausnitzii abundance (r=-0.566, P < 0.01) and positively correlated with anaerobic butyrate-producing bacteria abundance (r = 0.406, P < 0.01). Mediation analysis suggested that fALFF values in the right SFG may indirectly modulate depressive symptoms via regulating Faecalibacterium prausnitzii abundance (indirect effect 95% CI: 0.3039-2.4466), with a significant partial mediation effect observed, though future studies controlling for dietary and other confounding variables are needed to confirm this relationship.
conclusiontaVNS effectively alleviates depressive symptoms in MDD patients via dual complementary pathways: directly modulating neural activity in the right SFG to regulate depression-related brain function, and indirectly maintaining gut microbiota homeostasis by enriching beneficial taxa such as Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. These findings provide novel mechanistic insights into the brain-gut interaction underlying the antidepressant effects of taVNS, laying a theoretical foundation for its clinical application in MDD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.