ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2026
Nanocomposite sublingual films: a scoping review of formulation trends and translational gaps.
Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sublingual films are promising drug delivery platforms due to their rapid hydration and drug release, and the incorporation of nanoparticles can further improve drug solubility, bioavailability, and therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, this study aims to identify, map, and synthesize the available evidence on nanocomposite films for sublingual drug delivery. This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) framework and reported following the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). A total of 226 articles were initially identified, of which 31 met the inclusion criteria (2014-2025). Among them, microemulsions, and cyclodextrin complexes were the most frequently investigated systems (6/31), followed by nanofibers (5/31), polymeric nanoparticles (4/31), niosomes (3/31), and nanocrystals (3/31). Overall, these technologies were primarily selected to enhance drug solubility, dissolution, and mucosal transport. Other nanostructures, including nanocapsules, liposomes, micelles, and transferosomes, were each reported (1/31). Regarding film-forming matrices, synthetic and semisynthetic polymers were predominantly used (26/31), particularly HPMC, PVA, and PVP, whereas natural polymers were underexplored (5/31), highlighting a reliance on conventional pharmaceutical excipients. However, few studies provided robust pharmacological evidence (2/31) or comprehensive toxicity assessments (5/31), revealing important gaps. Moreover, 13 studies performed permeation evaluations, indicating that a substantial proportion of the evidence remains limited to physicochemical characterization without functional assessment of drug transport across the mucosa. Similarly, bioavailability was investigated in fewer than one-third of the studies (9/31), although the available evidence generally demonstrated improved bioavailability compared with conventional formulations. Furthermore, significant methodological heterogeneity in disintegration protocols and mucosal models hinders the comparability of clinical outcomes. Overall, this scoping review highlights nano-based sublingual films as promising strategies to improve drug bioavailability, while emphasizing the need for more standardized methodologies and rigorous pharmacological and safety evaluations to facilitate their translational advancement toward clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42487094What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.