ReviewJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026
Artificial intelligence in impurity prediction: current landscape, challenges, and future directions.
Review in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Earlier identification, regulation of impurities in pharmaceutical products is critical throughout the medication development process because they have a high impact on drug quality, safety, and regulatory approval. Traditional analytical methods like LC-MS and NMR are frequently used, but they are labour intensive, time consuming and have limited capacity to detect unknown or trace level impurities. New opportunities to forecast impurity formation before experimental observation have been enabled by developments in cheminformatics and computer modelling. This study covers advanced chemical representation techniques, data generation, data curation, and model validation with highlighting recent advances in machine learning and deep learning algorithms for impurity prediction. In association with forecasting synthetic by products, degradation products, and harmful contaminants, traditional QSAR techniques, and contemporary deep learning models such as graph neural networks, transformer based architectures, and generative frameworks are examined. Additionally, discussed the increasing significance of explainable models for regulatory body acceptability. Lastly, newly developed advanced techniques like digital twins, automated impurity profiling, integrated reaction degradation modelling, and real-time monitoring are examined, demonstrating how computational methods are transforming impurity assessment from a reactive effort into a predictive and preventive procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42487063What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.