Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42487063›Full record

ReviewJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026

Artificial intelligence in impurity prediction: current landscape, challenges, and future directions.

Shreehari Thombre, Chandrakant Bonde, Ritesh Bhole, Jineetkumar Gawad, Pawan Karwa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shreehari ThombreSSR College of Pharmacy, Silvassa, UT of DNH and DD, Silvassa, India. shrithombre0@gmai.com.
Chandrakant BondeSSR College of Pharmacy, Silvassa, UT of DNH and DD, Silvassa, India.
Ritesh BholeDr. D.Y. Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Pimpri, Pune, 411018, India. ritesh.bhole@dypvp.edu.in.
Jineetkumar GawadDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, University Road, Durban, 4041, South Africa.
Pawan KarwaDr. D.Y. Patil Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, Pimpri, Pune, 411018, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Earlier identification, regulation of impurities in pharmaceutical products is critical throughout the medication development process because they have a high impact on drug quality, safety, and regulatory approval. Traditional analytical methods like LC-MS and NMR are frequently used, but they are labour intensive, time consuming and have limited capacity to detect unknown or trace level impurities. New opportunities to forecast impurity formation before experimental observation have been enabled by developments in cheminformatics and computer modelling. This study covers advanced chemical representation techniques, data generation, data curation, and model validation with highlighting recent advances in machine learning and deep learning algorithms for impurity prediction. In association with forecasting synthetic by products, degradation products, and harmful contaminants, traditional QSAR techniques, and contemporary deep learning models such as graph neural networks, transformer based architectures, and generative frameworks are examined. Additionally, discussed the increasing significance of explainable models for regulatory body acceptability. Lastly, newly developed advanced techniques like digital twins, automated impurity profiling, integrated reaction degradation modelling, and real-time monitoring are examined, demonstrating how computational methods are transforming impurity assessment from a reactive effort into a predictive and preventive procedure.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDrug ContaminationCheminformaticsDeep LearningGraph Neural NetworksHumansMachine LearningPharmaceutical PreparationsPrediction AlgorithmsQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipPharmaceutical PreparationsArtificial intelligenceCheminformaticsGraph neural networksPharmaceutical impurity predictionQSAR modeling

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.