ArticleNature medicine2026
FcRH5×CD3 bispecific antibody cevostamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 1 trial.
Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03275103 (An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase I Trial Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Escalating Doses of Cevostamab), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase I Trial Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Escalating Doses of Cevostamab (BFCR4350A) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Next-generation antibody-based therapeutics in cancer: antibody-drug conjugates bispecific antibodies across hematologic malignancies and solid tumors.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fc receptor-homolog 5 (FcRH5) is a membrane protein that is ubiquitously expressed on myeloma cells. Cevostamab is a first-in-class, FcRH5×CD3 bispecific antibody. GO39775 is a phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study evaluating fixed-duration cevostamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Cevostamab was initiated with step-up dosing and continued at the target dose (TD) once every 3 weeks for 17 cycles (~12 months) unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Primary objectives were to evaluate safety, including determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and to identify a recommended phase 2 dose and schedule (RP2D) for cevostamab monotherapy. Secondary objectives included determining the rate of response and the duration of response (DOR). As of 24 February 2025, 324 patients had been enrolled; most were heavily pretreated (median prior lines, 6; triple-class refractory, 89.5% (290/324); prior B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted therapy, 47.5% (154/324)). The MTD was not reached. Across all TD levels (0.15-252 mg), grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs occurred in 59.6% (193/324) and 60.2% (195/324), respectively. Grade 5 AEs excluding disease progression occurred in 4.6% (15/324); 0.9% (3/324) were considered treatment related (hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, n = 2; disseminated intravascular coagulation in the context of pseudomonal sepsis, n = 1). Objective response and very good partial response or better rates were 42.1% (136/323) and 25.1% (81/323), respectively. Median DOR was 11.2 months (95% confidence interval, 8.3, 15.6). A total of 167 patients received treatment at the 160 mg TD level (RP2D). Objective response and very good partial response or better rates were 44.3% (74/167) and 25.7% (43/167) in all patients and 60.6% (43/71) and 39.4% (28/71) in the BCMA naive, respectively. Median DOR was 10.4 months in all patients and 19.7 months in the BCMA naive, with durable responses maintained after the completion of treatment. Cytokine release syndrome was grade 1 or 2 in the 0.3/1.2/3.6/160 mg triple step-up cohort (RP2D). Cevostamab had manageable safety and induced durable remissions in late-line relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03275103 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.