Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42487061›Full record

ArticleNature medicine2026

FcRH5×CD3 bispecific antibody cevostamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a phase 1 trial.

Adam D Cohen, Joshua Richter, Suzanne Trudel, Alexander Lesokhin, Jacob P Laubach, Sheeba K Thomas, Simon J Harrison, Luciano J Costa, Andrew Spencer, Rafael Fonseca and 14 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Nature medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03275103 (An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase I Trial Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Escalating Doses of Cevostamab), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03275103 phase1completednot on this map

An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase I Trial Evaluating the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Escalating Doses of Cevostamab (BFCR4350A) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenentech, Inc.Ran2017 to 2026Enrolled355ConditionsMultiple MyelomaArmsCevostamab, Tocilizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Adam D Cohen *Abramson Cancer Center and University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. adam.cohen@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0939-3843
Joshua Richter *Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Suzanne Trudel *Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7952-6352
Alexander Lesokhin *Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9321-702X
Jacob P LaubachDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
Sheeba K ThomasThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8596-7058
Simon J HarrisonPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Melbourne University, and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4555-6582
Luciano J CostaO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5362-2469
Andrew SpencerAlfred Health-Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rafael FonsecaMayo Clinic in Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5938-3769
Peter A ForsbergUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jesus G BerdejaTennessee Oncology and Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4362-0376
Rayan KaedbeyJewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nizar J BahlisArnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7353-7034
Paula Rodriguez-OteroClínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Maria-Victoria MateosHospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Centro de Investigación del Cáncer (CIC) and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Salamanca, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2390-1218
Tulika TyagiGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Divya SamineniGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Wenyu LiuGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Rin NakamuraGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Voleak ChoeurngGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Chihunt WongGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
James CooperGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Amrita KrishnanCity of Hope Duarte, Duarte, CA, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fc receptor-homolog 5 (FcRH5) is a membrane protein that is ubiquitously expressed on myeloma cells. Cevostamab is a first-in-class, FcRH5×CD3 bispecific antibody. GO39775 is a phase 1 dose-escalation and dose-expansion study evaluating fixed-duration cevostamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Cevostamab was initiated with step-up dosing and continued at the target dose (TD) once every 3 weeks for 17 cycles (~12 months) unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Primary objectives were to evaluate safety, including determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and to identify a recommended phase 2 dose and schedule (RP2D) for cevostamab monotherapy. Secondary objectives included determining the rate of response and the duration of response (DOR). As of 24 February 2025, 324 patients had been enrolled; most were heavily pretreated (median prior lines, 6; triple-class refractory, 89.5% (290/324); prior B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted therapy, 47.5% (154/324)). The MTD was not reached. Across all TD levels (0.15-252 mg), grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs occurred in 59.6% (193/324) and 60.2% (195/324), respectively. Grade 5 AEs excluding disease progression occurred in 4.6% (15/324); 0.9% (3/324) were considered treatment related (hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, n = 2; disseminated intravascular coagulation in the context of pseudomonal sepsis, n = 1). Objective response and very good partial response or better rates were 42.1% (136/323) and 25.1% (81/323), respectively. Median DOR was 11.2 months (95% confidence interval, 8.3, 15.6). A total of 167 patients received treatment at the 160 mg TD level (RP2D). Objective response and very good partial response or better rates were 44.3% (74/167) and 25.7% (43/167) in all patients and 60.6% (43/71) and 39.4% (28/71) in the BCMA naive, respectively. Median DOR was 10.4 months in all patients and 19.7 months in the BCMA naive, with durable responses maintained after the completion of treatment. Cytokine release syndrome was grade 1 or 2 in the 0.3/1.2/3.6/160 mg triple step-up cohort (RP2D). Cevostamab had manageable safety and induced durable remissions in late-line relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03275103 .

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificCD3 ComplexMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedRecurrenceAntibodies, BispecificCD3 Complex

Identifiers

PMID42487061
PMCPMC13472967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.