Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42487056›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

To compare the efficacy and safety between balloon dilation and robot-assisted laparoscopic ureter reconstruction in treating short (≤ 2 cm) ureter stricture following holmium laser: a single-center retrospective study.

Chao Cai, Rongxin Liu, Gaoyuanzhi Yue, Siqiao Peng, Qinwei Liu, Jiaxuan Li, Yikang Wang, Hao Yu, Pingkaiqi He, Pei Deng and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Chao Cai *Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Rongxin Liu *Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Gaoyuanzhi Yue *Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Siqiao PengDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Qinwei LiuDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiaxuan LiDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yikang WangDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hao YuDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Pingkaiqi HeDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Pei DengDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. lyurology0507@163.com.
Haoran ShanDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 2416050310@qq.com.
Yongda LiuDepartment of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China. 13719007083@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2032-1314

Funding

Clinical High and Important Technology of Guangzhou, China No. 2024C-GX21the National Natural Science Foundation of China No.82370766the Science and Technology Plan Program of Guangzhou, China No. 202201020511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ureteral stricture is an important complication following holmium laser lithotripsy. Although robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction (RALUR) may provide durable anatomical repair, balloon dilation (BD) is frequently used for short strictures because of its minimally invasive nature and shorter recovery time. This retrospective single-center study compared the efficacy and safety of RALUR and BD for short (≤2 cm) ureteral strictures following holmium laser lithotripsy. Patients treated with RALUR or BD between February 2016 and October 2021 were reviewed. Eligible patients had a solitary ureteral stricture measuring ≤2 cm, no history of ureteral laceration or prior ureteral surgery, and at least 2 years of follow-up after double-J stent removal. The primary outcome was surgical success. A total of 104 patients were initially included, and 69 remained after propensity score matching, including 46 in the RALUR group and 23 in the BD group. Before matching, patients in the RALUR group had longer strictures and a higher prevalence of diabetes; after matching, baseline characteristics were well balanced. The overall complication rate did not differ significantly between the groups, and no patient required blood transfusion. The postoperative hospital stay was longer in the RALUR group [5 (5-6) days vs. 1 (1-3) day, P < 0.001], and surgical costs were also higher. During follow-up, success rates decreased in both groups, with a more pronounced decline in the BD group. At 24 months, the success rate was significantly higher after RALUR than after BD (82.61% vs. 26.09%, P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression showed that BD and higher BMI were independently associated with reoperation. RALUR provided significantly higher and more durable success rates than BD for holmium laser-related short ureteral strictures, although it was associated with longer hospitalization and higher costs.

Indexed as

DilatationLaparoscopyLasers, Solid-StateLithotripsy, LaserPlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRobotic Surgical ProceduresUreterUreteral ObstructionAgedConstriction, PathologicFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedBalloon dilationRALURRobot-assisted laparoscopic ureter reconstructionUreteral strictureUreter reconstruction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.