Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42487034›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2026

A novel method for evaluating the thickness and keratometry profiles of toric lenticules created by a new-generation keratorefractive lenticule extraction platform.

Yishan Qian, Junjie Yu, Mingjia Xie, Yiyang Wang, Xingtao Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yishan Qian *Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 13917852240@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8698-3316
Junjie YuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Mingjia XieDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yiyang WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xingtao Zhou *Department of Ophthalmology, Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. doctzhouxingtao@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3465-1579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate the thickness and keratometry profiles of toric lenticules created by keratorefractive lenticule extraction (KLEx) using the VISUMAX 800 femtosecond laser platform.

methodsThis prospective study included the right eyes of 42 patients who underwent KLEx with VISUMAX 800 for correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism. Custom software generated spatial profiles of lenticule thickness (LT) and surgically-induced change in keratometry (SIK) based on raw pre- and postoperative tomographic data. The following indices were calculated: lenticule thickness per unit dioptre (LT/D), LT at the steep and flat meridians and their difference (LT

resultsA significant difference in average LT/D was observed across optical zones (OZ), with LT/D with OZ increasing non-linearly with OZs. The lenticule exhibited a convex shape, thinning more rapidly towards the periphery. Flat LT/D exceeded steep LT/D and the difference (LT

conclusionsThe spatial profiles of LT and SIK reflect the toric treatment module for astigmatic correction. This study introduces a method for in vivo measurement of lenticular spatial profiles, enabling quantitative assessment of lenticule geometry.

Indexed as

AstigmatismCorneaCorneal StromaCorneal Surgery, LaserLasers, ExcimerMyopiaAdultCorneal TopographyFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42487034
PMCPMC13675243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.