SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Synthesis of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations for breast cancer survivorship care: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBreast cancer survivorship care is complex and not always provided according to standards or guidelines. Likewise, current cancer survivorship care interventions and programming do not always underscore clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in the same fashion as interventions for other conditions. A call for improvement in breast cancer survivorship care warrants re-evaluation of current breast cancer survivorship care CPGs. The purpose of this systematic review was to (1) characterize CPGs that include content clinically relevant to people with a history of breast cancer and (2) appraise the possibility of consolidating current CPGs to simplified topics to be presented as a potentially clinically applicable model of breast cancer survivorship care (PROSPERO CRD42024591381).
methodsWe conducted searches within six databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane DSR, and Cochrane Central), and in ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, ClinicalTrials.gov, and FigShare, Google, Google Scholar, and Bing. We located 3041 records to be screened and 191 records for full-text screening. Based on inclusion criteria considering clinical relevance to people with a history of breast cancer and AGREE II assessments, 21 records were included. We developed a codebook using the NCCN guidelines for cancer survivorship care.
resultsAreas of concordance were identified as three consolidated topics: risk for recurrence, monitoring for new cancer, and fertility, reproductive, endocrine, and sexual health. These are underpinned by care coordination. Topics include main ideas derived from NCCN guidelines. We labeled each recommendation with main ideas that are more succinct, yet still inclusive/indicative of the full array of CPGs.
conclusionWe propose consideration and testing of our consolidated breast cancer survivorship care topics and main ideas. We hypothesize that our model could simplify breast cancer survivorship care provision in primary care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.