Observational studyReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2026
Does Chronic Endometritis Affect Pregnancy Outcomes in Non-Assisted Reproductive Fertility Treatments?
Observational study in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate whether chronic endometritis (CE) affects pregnancy outcomes in non-assisted reproductive technology (non-ART) treatments, including timed intercourse (TI) and intrauterine insemination (IUI). This prospective observational study included 50 patients who underwent conventional infertility treatment at Yamagata University Hospital between April 2020 and March 2022. Endometrial tissue samples were collected during hysteroscopic screening and assessed for CE using CD138 immunostaining. CE was diagnosed when ≥ 5 CD138-positive plasma cells were identified in at least one of 10 randomly selected high-power fields. Pregnancy outcomes were compared between CE-positive and CE-negative groups, and generalized estimating equation analyses were performed to account for repeated treatment cycles within the same patient. Among the 50 participants, 27 were CE-positive and 23 were CE-negative, yielding a CE prevalence of 54.0%. A total of 146 treatment cycles were analyzed. Clinical pregnancy rates were 10.6% in the CE-negative group and 13.8% in the CE-positive group, and live birth or second-trimester termination rates were 10.6% and 12.5%, respectively. In crude and adjusted analyses, CE was not significantly associated with clinical pregnancy or live birth or second-trimester termination. CD138-positive plasma cell counts were not clearly associated with pregnancy outcomes. In this limited single-center cohort, CE was not significantly associated with poorer pregnancy outcomes in TI or IUI treatments. However, because of the limited sample size and small number of pregnancy events, these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Larger studies are needed to determine whether CE screening or treatment has clinical value during non-ART fertility care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42487002What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.