ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2026
Smartphone-Assisted CSCTAS-Derived Sperm Kinematics and Clinical Pregnancy after Intrauterine Insemination in a Turkish Cohort of Couples with Unexplained Infertility.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional semen analysis provides limited information on sperm kinematic behavior in couples with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI). We used a laboratory based, microscope mounted smartphone-assisted Computerized Sperm Counting and Tracking Analysis System (CSCTAS) to characterize sperm kinematics in prepared samples and compare them by ultrasound-confirmed clinical pregnancy after IUI. In this retrospective single-center Turkish cohort, 184 first IUI cycles between January 2018 and December 2019 were analyzed. Prepared samples were assessed under standardized Makler chamber conditions. Manual-CSCTAS agreement for total motility was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis, and single-variable receiver operating characteristic analyses were supplementary. Clinical pregnancy occurred in 29 cycles (15.8%). Pre- and post-preparation semen parameters were similar between groups. Mean CSCTAS-derived wobble (WOB) was higher in pregnancy-positive cycles (0.83 ± 0.03 vs. 0.81 ± 0.09; p = 0.004; Cohen's d = 0.24), whereas beat-cross frequency (BCF) was lower at the nominal level (7.28 ± 0.70 vs. 7.61 ± 1.05 Hz; p = 0.039; d = - 0.33). Although statistically significant, the differences had small effect sizes. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean bias of - 3.44% points, 95% limits of agreement of - 24.69 to 17.81, and proportional bias. Single-variable area under the curve (AUC) values were 0.526 for WOB and 0.555 for BCF, and both 95% confidence intervals included 0.50. These findings suggest exploratory population-level digital motility signals; however, the small effect sizes and near-chance single-variable AUC values indicate limited predictive performance and do not support their use as standalone predictors of individual IUI outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42487001What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.