Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42486939›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Asymmetric Puzzle Spreader Graft: A Systematic Approach for Correction of Crooked Nose Deformity.

Erkan Yildiz, Mehmet Yurtseven, Çağlar Günebakan, Selçuk Kuzu, Fatih Çelenk, Abdulkadir Bucak, Orhan Kemal Kahveci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Erkan YildizDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. dr.erkanyildiz@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0265-7327
Mehmet YurtsevenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
Çağlar GünebakanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3281-9785
Selçuk KuzuDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0511-9874
Fatih ÇelenkDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.
Abdulkadir BucakDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3031-3465
Orhan Kemal KahveciDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6159-133X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorrection of crooked nose deformity remains one of the most challenging aspects of rhinoplasty. C-shaped and reverse C-shaped nasal deviations require asymmetric surgical approaches to achieve optimal aesthetic and functional outcomes. Traditional symmetric spreader graft techniques often fail to address the underlying asymmetric deformity adequately.

objectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a novel asymmetric puzzle spreader graft technique combined with asymmetric osteotomy and osteoplasty in correcting C-shaped and reverse C-shaped nasal deviations.

methodsBetween 2021 and 2023, 50 patients (27 males, 23 females; mean age 35.4 years; range 18-50 years) with axial deviation (28 C-shaped, 22 reverse C-shaped) underwent rhinoplasty using asymmetric osteotomy, osteoplasty, and asymmetric puzzle spreader grafts performed by a single surgeon. On the wider convex side, an extended asymmetric spreader graft reaching the radix was placed, while on the narrower concave side, a smaller spreader graft starting from the K-point was inserted. Rhinion deviation angle (RDA) and nasal tip deviation angle (NDA) were measured using GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP, version 2.8.22) on frontal photographs. Mean follow-up was 2 years (range: 1-3 years).

resultsPreoperative mean RDA was 7.28° (range: 3.5-17.46°), which significantly decreased to 3.15° (range: 1.1-4.2°) postoperatively (P < 0.05). Preoperative mean NDA was 4.67° (range: 2.5-13.01°), which significantly decreased to 1.23° (range: 0.45-3.21°) postoperatively (P < 0.05). The mean preoperative Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) score was 62.57 (SD: 19.44; median: 71), which significantly improved to 21.84 (SD: 16.81; median: 16) at 1-year postoperative follow-up (P < 0.001). Statistical analysis using Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed significant improvement in both RDA (56.7% reduction), NDA (73.7% reduction), and NOSE scores (65.1% reduction). Complications included one wound infection (2%), two minor nasal bleeding episodes (4%), and one patient requiring revision (2%).

conclusionsThe asymmetric puzzle spreader graft technique combined with asymmetric osteotomy provides effective correction of crooked nose deformity with significant improvement in objective nasal deviation measurements and low complication rates. This technique addresses the asymmetric nature of the deformity by tailoring graft size and placement to each side's specific anatomical requirements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

NoseNose Deformities, AcquiredOsteotomyRhinoplastyAdolescentAdultEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAsymmetric osteotomyCrooked noseC-shaped deformityNasal deviationRhinoplastySpreader graft

Identifiers

PMID42486939
PMCPMC13630951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.