Trial reportScientific reports2026
Exploratory analyses of potential moderators of a personalized intervention to reduce preoperative anxiety: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This exploratory secondary analysis investigated whether individual patient characteristics might moderate the effectiveness of a personalized, information-based intervention aimed at reducing preoperative anxiety. The study included 122 patients scheduled for elective surgery. Anxiety was assessed repeatedly before surgery using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale alongside numeric rating scales, capturing surgery-related anxiety, anesthesia-related anxiety, and overall anxiety. Constrained linear mixed models were applied to evaluate potential moderating effects of sociodemographic (e.g., education), psychological (e.g., neuroticism, depression, need for information, perceived physician competence and warmth), and clinical variables (e.g., smoking status, previous surgeries, type of surgery, chronic pain, premedication). The intervention consisted of a structured conversation supplemented by optional video material. The analyses provided little evidence that intervention effects systematically differed according to the examined patient characteristics. Among the examined moderators, chronic pain yielded the strongest indication of potential effect modification with regard to anesthesia-related anxiety outcomes. However, these findings did not remain statistically significant after correction for multiple testing and should therefore be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Overall, the present findings provide no confirmatory evidence that the effectiveness of the intervention differs systematically across the examined patient characteristics. Future adequately powered studies are needed to determine whether specific patient characteristics influence response to personalized preoperative anxiety interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.