ArticleScientific reports2026
Automatic classification of female body shape using 3D anthropometric scan data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding individual differences in body shape is essential for improving apparel fit, yet conventional sizing systems often fail to reflect the full spectrum of morphological diversity. This study presents a data-driven framework for classifying female body shapes using three-dimensional (3D) body scan data. A dataset comprising 1,019 Korean women was processed to extract key anthropometric ratios, including chest-to-hip, hip-to-waist, and depth-based indices. After filtering out incomplete and outlier data, 815 valid samples were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and decision tree algorithms to derive body shape classification rules. The resulting taxonomy includes nine distinct shape types, which were further consolidated into three macro body shape groups based on morphological dominance: Top Hourglass, Regular Hourglass, and Bottom Hourglass. Canonical discriminant analysis achieved an overall classification accuracy of 93.6%, suggesting that the classification model is robust. This study provides a statistically grounded and reproducible methodology for body shape classification, offering a practical foundation for apparel pattern customization and mass-customized garment production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.