ReviewSignal transduction and targeted therapy2026
Combinatorial in situ cancer vaccines: unlocking broad and enhanced antitumor responses.
Review in Signal transduction and targeted therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In situ cancer vaccination, also termed intratumoral immunotherapy, transforms the tumor microenvironment into an endogenous vaccine platform by leveraging the tumor itself as a source of antigens. Unlike conventional tumor-associated antigen (TAA) or personalized neoantigen vaccines that require predefined targets and complex manufacturing, in situ cancer vaccination presents the tumor's full antigenic repertoire, including TAAs, neoantigens, post-translationally modified epitopes, cryptic peptides, and viral antigens within their native context. This broad antigen exposure elicits robust polyclonal cytotoxic T-cell responses, facilitates epitope spreading, and reduces immune escape driven by tumor heterogeneity. The therapeutic efficacy of this approach arises from the coordinated activation of multiple immune mechanisms. Programmed cell death pathways, including immunogenic apoptosis, pyroptosis, necroptosis, and ferroptosis, release tumor antigens and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) that promote dendritic-cell activation, efficient cross-presentation, and the priming of durable effector and memory T cells. The incorporation of potent adjuvants and advanced delivery platforms enhances innate-adaptive crosstalk and helps remodel the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Despite these advantages, clinical translation is limited by inconsistent induction of immunogenic cell death, suboptimal intratumoral retention of therapeutics, and barriers to T-cell infiltration. Recent advances in nanomedicine-enabled delivery systems, microenvironmental modulation, and combinatorial strategies, particularly with immune checkpoint blockade, are overcoming these challenges. Collectively, these innovations position in situ cancer vaccination as a patient-tailored, broadly applicable immunotherapy capable of eliciting durable and systemic antitumor immunity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.