Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42486843›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2026

Developing Efficient and Accurate Polarizable Molecular Simulation Models for Studying Refrigerants and Their Binary Mixtures.

Haihui Wang, Ying-Lung Steve Tse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haihui WangDepartment of Chemistry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.
Ying-Lung Steve TseDepartment of Chemistry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Sha Tin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1187-2296

Funding

Chinese University of Hong Kong CUHK 4053702Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee GRF 14301724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrofluoroolefins (HFOs) are promising low-global-warming-potential refrigerants, but the scarcity of mixture data limits reliable prediction of their phase behavior and thermodynamic properties under practical operating conditions. Here, we develop a data-efficient polarizable molecular modeling strategy for HFO-1234yf, HFO-1234ze(E), and their binary mixtures by combining high-level quantum-mechanical potential-energy data with a limited set of condensed-phase experimental properties, including liquid density, heat capacity, and enthalpy of vaporization. The resulting force fields reproduce key thermodynamic properties of the pure fluids, including isobaric heat capacities and enthalpies of vaporization, over broad temperature ranges, with most deviations within 5% of experimental values. The models also accurately describe vapor-liquid equilibrium behavior across wide temperature and composition ranges, predicting mixture saturation pressures with a mean absolute error of 0.43 bar and surface tensions of the pure fluids and equimolar blend with a mean absolute error of 1.36 mN/m. Structural, energetic, and free-energy analyses reveal that fluorinated-group nonbonded interactions govern volatility and nonideal mixing, leading to preferential enrichment of HFO-1234yf in the vapor phase. Overall, this work demonstrates that polarizable force fields refined using high-level quantum data and minimal experimental input can provide accurate, transferable predictions for refrigerant blends in data-sparse regimes, offering a practical framework for molecular design and screening of next-generation low-GWP refrigerants.

Identifiers

PMID42486843
PMCPMC13455069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.