Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42486672›Full record

ArticleeNeuro2026

Zebra Finch Introductory Notes Become Song-Like But Have Different Timing and Acoustic Correlations with the Song That Follows.

Divya Rao, Devika Babu Kizhakoot, Shikha Kalra, Harini Suri, Sonam Chorol, Raghav Rajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Divya RaoDivision of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune (IISER Pune), Pune, Maharashtra 411008, India.
Devika Babu KizhakootDivision of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune (IISER Pune), Pune, Maharashtra 411008, India.
Shikha KalraDivision of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune (IISER Pune), Pune, Maharashtra 411008, India.
Harini SuriDivision of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune (IISER Pune), Pune, Maharashtra 411008, India.
Sonam ChorolDivision of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune (IISER Pune), Pune, Maharashtra 411008, India.
Raghav RajanDivision of Biology, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Pune (IISER Pune), Pune, Maharashtra 411008, India raghav@iiserpune.ac.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7770-3711

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male zebra finches begin their song bouts by repeating a short sound called an introductory note (IN). As INs repeat, their timing and acoustic properties change, similar to premovement neural preparatory activity seen in primates and rodents. Hence, INs are thought to reflect motor preparation for starting song. However, INs themselves are vocalizations/movements, like the song that follows, suggesting that INs could be part of the song sequence. To determine how similar songs and INs are, we compared their properties in adult, male zebra finches recorded across 3 years. First, song and INs simultaneously changed in the first year post-hatch; as described earlier, songs became faster and we found an increase of 0.58 ± 0.07 in mean IN number. Second, as described earlier, IN properties changed from first to last IN. Here, we found that these changes were driven by the last IN becoming more like the first song syllable in duration, amplitude, and timing. Third, within each bout, first song syllable timing was correlated with last IN timing in only 18% of birds. Amplitude and mean frequency of the first song syllable was correlated not only with the last IN, but also with the first IN and second song syllable in >40% of birds. Finally, the reduction in gaps between successive INs was not seen in other types of repeat syllables. Overall, the acoustic similarities between INs and song suggest that INs are part of the song sequence, but timing differences suggest different mechanisms for controlling IN timing.

Indexed as

FinchesVocalization, AnimalAcousticsAnimalsMaleSound SpectrographyTime Factorsintroductory notesmotor preparationnaturally learned movementssongbirdsong initiationzebra finch

Identifiers

PMID42486672
PMCPMC13471931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.