Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42486668›Full record

ReviewBlood advances2026

Editing around the target: epitope engineering to protect stem cell grafts.

Joanne Baek, Gabriele Casirati, Pietro Genovese, Saar Gill

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joanne BaekCenter for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0002-0214-5161
Gabriele CasiratiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0003-1925-1195
Pietro GenoveseDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA.ORCID 0000-0001-9507-9003
Saar GillCenter for Cellular Immunotherapies, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.ORCID 0000-0001-7946-7778

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractTargeted immunotherapies have transformed the treatment of hematologic malignancies, yet their clinical utility is often constrained by on-target, off-tumor toxicity arising from shared antigen expression between malignant cells and essential healthy tissues. An early approach to mitigate this limitation involved the knockout of the target antigen in donor hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. However, this strategy is restricted to markers that are dispensable for normal hematopoietic function. Epitope engineering has emerged as an alternative paradigm to decouple therapeutic susceptibility from physiological function by modifying the target antigen on healthy cells while preserving biological activity. In this review, we discuss recent advances in base and prime editing approaches used for epitope editing. We examine recent preclinical and emerging translational studies of this strategy in both malignant and nonmalignant contexts. Finally, we discuss challenges related to editing efficiency, off-target effects, delivery strategies, and long-term safety in hematopoietic stem cells. Collectively, epitope engineering of hematopoietic stem cells represents a versatile platform to expand the therapeutic window of precision immunotherapies and may enable safer, more effective combinatorial treatment strategies for both nonmalignant and malignant hematologic conditions.

Indexed as

EpitopesGene EditingHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansImmunotherapyEpitopes

Identifiers

PMID42486668
PMCPMC13594888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.