SynthesisEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2026
Change in pulmonary artery pressure upon acute exposure to high altitude: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/research questionWe investigated the increase in pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) with altitude gain in healthy low-altitude residents travelling to high altitude, analysing reported measures including systolic (sPAP) and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient (TRPG).
methodsA systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and Embase from database inception to 12 December 2024. Studies including healthy adults residing at <1000 m and reporting sPAP, mPAP or TRPG measured by echocardiography or right heart catheterisation at both low altitude and >1000 m within 30 days were included. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regression assessed the increase in sPAP, mPAP and TRPG per 1000 m altitude gain.
results60 articles with 1220 participants (75% males, age 34±4 years) were eligible; 54 were included into the meta-analysis. sPAP was reported in 38 studies, mPAP in nine and TRPG in 11. At high altitude, absolute sPAP ranged from 24 to 50 mmHg and mPAP from 20 to 26 mmHg. Meta-regression showed a linear increase per 1000 m: sPAP 3.4±0.5 mmHg, mPAP 2.5±0.7 mmHg and TRPG 3.3±1.0 mmHg. The estimated upper limit of normal for the increase per 1000 m was 4.5 mmHg for all three measures.
interpretationThis systematic review and meta-analysis of healthy low-altitude residents travelling to high altitudes demonstrates a linear increase in PAP with altitude gain, based predominantly on data from elevations >2500 m and younger male populations. It defines upper reference limits for the increase in sPAP, mPAP and TRPG per 1000 m. These population-derived reference ranges may assist in the interpretation of PAP measurements and in counselling individuals evaluated at high altitude, but should be applied with consideration of the underlying population and exposure characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.