ArticlePoultry science2026
Impact of improved chicken production systems on household income and dietary diversity in Tigray, Ethiopia: Evidence from an endogenous switching regression model.
Article in Poultry science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chicken farming is an important livelihood activity for households in the Tigray Region of Ethiopia, contributing to income generation and access to animal-source foods. However, robust evidence on the welfare impacts of improved chicken production systems remains limited. This study examined the effects of adopting improved chicken production systems on household income and dietary diversity among chicken-producing households. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,005 households across 11 districts in Tigray. Data were collected through structured face-to-face interviews, with annual household income from chicken production and Household Dietary Diversity Scores (HDDS) used as the primary outcome indicators. An Endogenous Switching Regression (ESR) model was employed to correct for potential self-selection bias and estimate the welfare effects of adopting improved chicken production systems on income and dietary diversity outcomes. Results indicated that adoption of improved chicken production systems generated substantial economic and nutritional benefits. Adopting households gained, on average, USD 666 annually compared with the income they would have achieved under traditional production systems, while non-adopting households could potentially increase their annual income by USD 710 if they adopted improved systems. The overall average income gain attributable to adoption was estimated at USD 690 per household. Adoption also improved household dietary diversity, increasing HDDS by 0.52 food groups among adopters and by 0.31 food groups among non-adopters under the counterfactual adoption scenario, with an overall average improvement of 0.42 food groups. Adoption of improved chicken production systems was positively associated with younger household heads, higher educational attainment, larger flock sizes, and improved access to veterinary services, whereas female-headed households and households with larger livestock holdings were less likely to adopt. Overall, improved chicken production systems generated substantial economic and nutritional gains, underscoring their potential to strengthen household livelihoods and food security in Tigray. Expanding access to veterinary and extension services, strengthening producer training, and improving access to affordable, quality production inputs are essential to accelerate adoption and maximize these benefits, particularly among resource-constrained households.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.