ArticleNeoplasia (New York, N.Y.)2026
The partner gene modulates response to asciminib in ABL1-rearranged Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Article in Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ABL-rearranged (ABLr) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with treatment failure and relapse and novel treatments are required. We investigated asciminib efficacy against NUP214::ABL1 ALL, the second most common ABL1 rearrangement associated with aggressive disease. Asciminib activity was established in three patient derived xenograft models of NUP214::ABL1 ALL with different ABL1 breakpoints (e31a2, e32a3, e34a3). In all models, treatment with asciminib reduced NUP214::ABL1 leukemic burden and increased survival outcomes compared with control mice. These results contrast with recent in vitro studies in the setting of BCR::ABL1 leukemia, where ABL1 exon 3 breakpoints (e13a3, e14a3) result in asciminib resistance due to incomplete SH3 domain. Conversely, in silico modeling of NUP214::ABL1 e32a3 predicted NUP214 exon 32 mimics the missing ABL1 exon 2, forming a chimeric SH3 domain that rescues asciminib sensitivity. This prediction was supported by viability assays of Ba/F3 cells expressing NUP214::ABL1 with exon 32 present and absent. Additional viability assays and structural modeling of NUP214::ABL1 Ba/F3 cells expressing various ABL1 deletions defined a region of the SH3 domain critical for asciminib efficacy and necessary for allosteric inhibition. Our findings establish asciminib as a potential treatment for NUP214::ABL1 ALL and reveal a critical role for the fusion partner gene. Asciminib efficacy in ABLr leukemia cannot be predicted by evaluating ABL1 exon 2 inclusion/exclusion in isolation. This is of clinical importance as first-line use of STAMP inhibitors such as asciminib becomes more common.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.