ArticleBrazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals working in otolaryngology: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic is caused by the highly infectious and transmissible SARS-CoV-2 virus. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (OHNS) practice is at high risk of transmission and subsequently affected by guideline changes and procedure cancellations or postponements. We aimed to gather opinions regarding the pandemic's personal and professional impact from OHNS professionals globally. STUDY DESIGN/
settingA cross-sectional survey was developed and administered using snowball sampling for surgical staff, trainees, and connected allied health workers in OHNS globally in May 2021.
methodsItem generation was developed via selection of measures from an existing global perspectives survey with additional measures piloted by clinical context experts, service providers, and researchers.
resultsThe majority of the 452 total responses were collected from the Americas (68.9%) and identified as female (64.4%). The most commonly reported workplace challenge was fear of illness (21.1%). Respondents generally favoured policies implemented by local health authorities (69.7%) but believed that policies were implemented too late (49.6%). Three main themes surfaced: 1) Unclear guidelines for allied OHNS professionals, 2) Fear regarding COVID-19 transmission due to varied understanding of transmission and PPE adoption, and 3) Resilience of OHNS workers despite continued professional and personal challenges.
conclusionIndividuals reported generalized fear and frustration in their personal and professional lives due to COVID-19 pandemic. However, they exhibited agility to overcome these challenges. Ongoing support from government and OHNS societies is key to aid health professionals providing essential care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, cohort cross-sectional survey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.