ReviewJACC. Advances2026
Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia Treatment: Evaluating the Evidence for Established and Newly Approved Options.
Review in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) imposes a substantial burden on patients and health care systems. Despite available treatments, a notable gap exists between evidence-based medicine and real-world practice. Acute treatments such as intravenous adenosine require administration in clinical settings. At-home vagal maneuvers are simple and cost-effective yet are often less effective than those administered by health care providers. The pill-in-the-pocket strategy, defined as patient-administered beta blocker or calcium-channel blocker therapy, is limited by delayed onset of action and risk of side-effects, and is not supported by robust clinical evidence or guidelines. Approved in late 2025, etripamil nasal spray represents a promising advancement that may provide a safe, effective, self-administered therapy used outside of health care setting. In this review, we examine the existing evidence and practical limitations of current PSVT treatments and discuss the potential clinical implications of etripamil as a novel, rapidly acting, self-administered therapy for the termination of acute symptomatic PSVT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.