ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2026
Lung ultrasound interpretation using deep learning for the detection of B-lines in dogs.
Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeep learning (DL) shows promise for interpretation of lung ultrasound (LUS) images in humans, but its performance in animals remains underexplored. HYPOTHESIS/
objectivesAssess performance of a B-line detection algorithm (BLDA) trained on LUS images from humans when applied to images from dogs. ANIMALS: A total of 1,950 clips collected from 201 LUS examinations in 90 dogs across 4 studies.
methodsUltrasound clips were collated and labeled with A-line or B-line profiles by an expert reviewer. A DL model previously trained on LUS images from humans was applied to detect presence of B-lines at a framewise level. A clip classification algorithm was calibrated to maximize clip-level performance of the BLDA using a calibration data set. Performance of the DL model and BLDA was assessed on a held-out test set of LUS images. A heatmap-based explainability method was used to visualize regions most utilized by the model for predictions.
resultsWhen applied to the test set, the BLDA showed an overall accuracy of 87%, with sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 93%. The algorithm performed best when identifying images with strong (versus weak) B-line profiles. Assessing raw model predictions, zero-shot performance for identification of B-lines was excellent (area under the curve, 0.96). Heatmaps suggested that the DL model utilized image areas that were plausibly relevant for LUS interpretation. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: A LUS model trained on images from humans maintained strong performance when applied to dogs, supporting cross-species generalization to accelerate veterinary diagnostic innovations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.