Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42485572›Full record

ArticleArchives of endocrinology and metabolism2026

Mild and non-persistent fasting plasma glucose elevation in the first trimester of pregnancy is not associated with increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Natalia Gattass-Ferreira, Carlos Antonio Negrato, Ana Luiza de Mattos Telles, Gabriela Rogonsky da Costa, Claudia Saunders, Marcus Miranda de Oliveira, Melanie Rodacki, Lenita Zajdenverg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of endocrinology and metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Natalia Gattass-FerreiraDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-6878-8955
Carlos Antonio NegratoFaculdade de Medicina de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-3720-1183
Ana Luiza de Mattos TellesDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0009-0007-8570-7521
Gabriela Rogonsky da CostaDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8200-8943
Claudia SaundersInstituto de Nutrição Josué de Castro, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8815-6736
Marcus Miranda de OliveiraMaternidade Escola da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0003-2518-956X
Melanie RodackiUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Departamento de Clínica Médica Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil Departamento de Clínica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-9007-1325
Lenita ZajdenvergDepartamento de Clínica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-1579-3299

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate pregnancy outcomes in women with early gestational diabetes mellitus (eGDM) diagnosed by mild elevation of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in the first trimester. SUBJECTS AND

methodsThis prospective cohort study included 114 pregnant women with first trimester FPG <100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L). Women with FPG ≥92 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L) and <100 mg/dL (5.6 mmol/L) were classified as having eGDM, and FPG was reassessed after approximately 3-4 weeks. Women whose repeated FPG was <92 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L) were assigned to Group 1 (G1; n = 33) and did not receive eGDM treatment. These participants underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 24-28 weeks of gestation and, depending on the results, initiated treatment as indicated. Women with eGDM and a second FPG 92-125 mg/dL (5.1-6.9 mmol/L) were assigned to Group 2 (G2; n = 31) and immediately started eGDM treatment. The control group (G3; n = 50) was composed by pregnant women with FPG <92 mg/dL (5.1 mmol/L) in the first trimester.

resultsG1 and G3 had lower pre-pregnancy body mass index, less chronic hypertension, lower rates of GDM history, and lower multiparity compared to G2. There was no significant difference in GDM diagnosis by OGTT between G1 and G3 (27.3% vs. 20.0%, p = 0.594). G3 gained more weight (10.2 ± 7.6 kg, 7.5 ± 6.4 kg, and 13.5 ± 6.1 kg for G1, G2, and G3, respectively; p = 0.001). Other outcomes between G1 and G3 were similar.

conclusionWomen with eGDM diagnosed by mild, non-persistent FPG elevation in the first trimester had similar outcomes to those with normal early FPG.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseDiabetes, GestationalFastingPregnancy OutcomePregnancy Trimester, FirstAdultFemaleGlucose Tolerance TestHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesRisk FactorsBlood Glucoseearly gestational diabetes mellitusfasting plasma glucosefirst trimesterGestational diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID42485572
PMCPMC13390903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.