ArticleJournal of basic microbiology2026
Substrate-Driven Microbiome Assembly in Water Hyacinth Vermicompost: Combined 16S rRNA and Shotgun Metagenomics for Sustainable Agriculture.
Article in Journal of basic microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Substrate composition is a primary determinant of microbial succession and functional dynamics in vermicomposting systems. However, comparative insights into how biomass pre-treatment influences microbial architecture and how different sequencing approaches capture these changes remain limited. In this study, evaluation was carried out on microbial community structure and metabolic potential in vermicompost derived from three forms of Eichhornia crassipes (water hyacinth) biomass, burnt biomass (BB), composted biomass (CB) and dry biomass (DB) using both 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and shotgun metagenomics. All treatments were dominated by bacterial communities (> 97%), with Proteobacteria (Pseudomonadota), Firmicutes (Bacillota), Actinobacteria and Bacteroidota representing core phyla across substrates. However, metagenomics revealed broader domain-level coverage, detecting Archaea and Fungi that were underrepresented in 16S datasets. Substrate-specific signatures were evident such as, composted biomass exhibited enrichment of lignin degradation and carbon cycling pathways; dry biomass showed methanogenesis, fermentation and phosphate solubilization signatures; and burnt biomass was associated with nitrogen fixation and sulphur metabolism. Shannon diversity was highest in composted biomass (H' = 5.21), reflecting enhanced niche diversification during substrate maturation. Comparative analysis demonstrated that 16S rRNA sequencing effectively captured dominant bacterial structure, whereas shotgun metagenomics provided superior taxonomic resolution and direct functional inference, particularly for low-abundance and non-bacterial taxa. Notably, functional differentiation among treatments was more pronounced than broad taxonomic shifts, indicating that biomass pre-treatment exerts stronger influence on ecological function than on core community composition. These findings demonstrate that integrating taxonomic and functional metagenomics enables substrate-specific optimization of vermicompost formulations and provides a framework for designing microbiome-informed strategies for sustainable agriculture and invasive biomass valorization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.