ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2026
Predicting disease spread from host movement data: Chronic wasting disease in North America as a case study.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting disease spread from host movement data: Chronic wasting disease in North America as a case study.The Journal of animal ecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rare long-distance movements can increase the spatial spread of invasive species and shifts in species ranges. For wildlife disease spread, however, seasonal migrations may only matter if they lead to transmission to individuals using different seasonal ranges, and the importance of juvenile dispersal depends on whether those juveniles are infected before they disperse. High-resolution animal movement data are increasing, but it is unclear how to leverage these data to improve predictions of future disease spread particularly in regions without pre-existing movement data. We predicted the speed of chronic wasting disease (CWD) spread based on movement metrics of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and compared our predictions to observed spreading rates in North America from 2005 to 2022. We hypothesized that CWD should spread faster in regions with long-distance migratory mule deer, but this hypothesis was only partially supported. Observed rates of CWD spread were faster in western epicentres with more mobile mule deer than in epicentres with only white-tailed deer (14-18 km/year compared with 5-7 km/year, respectively). However, the observed speed of CWD spread did not align well with migration distances. Deer movements in the Canadian Prairie Provinces were far shorter than those in Colorado and Wyoming, yet Canadian Prairie Provinces had faster CWD spread, and, much of that spread was in open prairies where deer movements tend to be along riverine corridors rather than the longer elevational migrations in more montane regions. Generally, our predicted rates of CWD spread from three different models were slower than the observed rates regardless of whether the model included dispersal or migration. Understanding these discrepancies is needed before high-resolution animal movement data can be used to predict broad-scale patterns of disease invasion. Anthropogenic movements likely explain longer distance movements of CWD across North America, but it remains unclear whether human-mediated movements or alternative analytical methods and deer movement metrics can explain the faster than predicted local CWD spread.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.